A Good Brand Buys You Forgiveness
Wednesday, July 30th, 2008As a connoisseur of Marketing Wisdom – why else would you be reading this – you’re well aware of the oft-touted virtues of an established brand. Perhaps the greatest of which is customer loyalty. However in this day of cut-throat competition, and rapidly diminishing “first to market” advantage, companies in ultra competitive markets may question whether “customer loyalty” is a dated concept.
I started to write “back in the good old days” but that’s a relative concept if there ever was one. So let’s say, back in the salad days of branding; the 1930’s to the 1970’s, a brand’s consistent appearance in the media could create a preference that verged on fratricidal. I’m thinking of the Ford trucks with decals in the back window showing a Calvin (of Calvin & Hobbes) look-alike urinating on a Chevy logo. Not to be outdone, I’ve seen plenty of Chevy trucks with Calvin mistreating a Ford logo.
When I was stationed overseas, a pack of Marlboroughs was thought to attract favorable attention from various frauleins, jeune filles and birds…at least those on the prowl for an American tourist.
Some brands carried such clout that they became adjectives of quality; Cadillac comes to mind. And that’s actually a pretty good example of the point of the title of the blog: A Good Brand Buys You Forgiveness.
In the case of Cadillac, I don’t mean the “goodness” of the brand to be the product, but the goodwill engendered by decades of marketing the brand as the category leader. It’s no secret that GM’s prize nameplate had fallen on hard times in the 80’s and 90’s as faster, sleeker, and more technologically sophisticated cars – first from Europe and then Japan – ate away at Cadillac’s quality reputation and enviable market position.
Then a few bright folks at GM decided that they could best beat the imports by borrowing from them. Zut Alors! Ach De Leiber Gott! Cadillac has begun to recapture some of its élan and its market share. My point is that without that wellspring of goodwill established by years of diligent brand-building, Cadillac might not have been able to crawl out of the grave.
Everybody knows the story of “new” Coke so I won’t retell it, except to say that a passionately loyal brand/fan base allowed the heavy breathers in Atlanta to mess with the secret formula, brag about doing it, humiliate themselves in front of their arch rival Pepsi Cola, and – when the dust settled – emerge with the dominant market share. Since then Pepsi has had to turn to juice, water, and restaurants to compete.
Harley Davidson – a company that has been on the rocks more times Johnny Walker Black – has survived and thrived thanks to their iconic status. Though, in their case, I would hazard that their brand was built less by advertising and more by the perceived “rebel” lifestyle of its core customer base – bikers. So strong is this image that the sight of plutocrats like Malcolm Forbes on a hog couldn’t dent it.
A recent benefactor of the principle that entrenched goodwill makes a brand resilient (if not death-proof) is Starbucks. Like a lot of successful brands, the wounds that caused Starbucks to fall to Earth were largely self-inflicted and, as a consequence, the company has abruptly retreated from its goal of world domination in order recapture both its profitability and corporate soul. However, when the company very publicly announced it was closing 600 stores, there was an outpouring of angst across the country resulting in the spontaneous creation of numerous petitions protesting the closures.
You cynics seating the back row may be nodding your heads and muttering that it’s all part of Howard Shultz’s master plan. If that’s true, more power to him. Whether the closures are a bluff, or corporate triage, Starbucks has demonstrated to McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts and any others who covet the latte crowd, the strength of their customer loyalty and, quite possibly, how that loyalty will restore the company’s fortunes.






