Ideas As Brands
Saturday, April 19th, 2008It’s no secret that the power of branded products is such that people pay significantly more than an item’s practical worth for something that they feel conveys distinction upon them. That’s perhaps the main reason why providers of goods and services invest in developing brands in teh first place. It’s also true that many people also seek to distinguish themselves by adopting and manifesting certain – often trendy – philosophies
In the 1930′s, Communism was hip among the American “progressive” intelligensia. The appeal of being seen by one’s fellows as modern and progressive – compared to, say, a member of the stolid middle class – was so strong that many self-annointed Progressives continued to herald the “worker’s paradise” fairy tale long after Stalin’s implacable brutality exposed Communism as a totalitarian nightmare that killed millions. “Useful Idiots” was how Stalin described such people.
Of course, prior to actually applying Communism to a benighted feudal state like Tsarist Russia, it had been mainly an academic theory proposed by a cranky, unkempt German philosopher with a poor grasp of economics let alone the consequences of foisting utopian theories on real people.
Das Kapital is next to impossible for the average person to comprehend so its themes were streamlined, repackaged and distributed by a horde of political con artists from Lenin, Mao and Fidel, to Pol Pot, Kim Jung Il and Hugo Chavez – power-hungry “visionaries” with agendas that had little to do with improving the lot of their fellow beings. Gee, “con artists with hidden agendas’ sounds a lot like what Progressives have to say about marketers and advertising.
In any case, my point is simply that people wear ideas as well as products to define themselves. One such idea today is Global Warming.
No, I am NOT disagreeing that the Earth is warming. It is…incrementally…just as it has in millennia past, after which it then cooled. Remember the Ice Age that killed the Dinosaurs. Not that I do – at least personally – but no one disputes that it happened. Or was it a meteor this killed the dinosaurs, or volcanoes? Still, I don’t think any reasonable person can doubt that our planet is going through a warming period. What I do think is arguable is the cause, which brings me to the Global Warming brand.
A large portion of our society, many of whom consider themselves forward-thinking, enlightened Progressives, believe that Mankind’s ill-conceived technology, greedy thirst for fossil fuels, and General Disregard for the Ecology are cooking the planet. Such is the passion of the GW crusaders that to dispute their beliefs is considered not just wrong, or misguided, but “evil,” and that I believe is the power and attraction of the Global Warming brand. When you profess a concern for Global Warming, you are not just making an observation or advocating an idea, you demonstrating that you are a GOOD AND NOBLE PERSON.
In the process of seeking such righteousness piety, these folks have labeled Global Warming as BAD…ipso facto…across the board…something to be feared, fought and conquered like Fascism and the right to own guns.
The other day I was watching The Universe on the History Channel. The episode’s topic was the dire consequences of Global Warming: melting ice shelves, glaciers no longer moving (ahem) glacially, but virtually racing to the sea, and Greenpeace shuttling polar bears among the last remaining ice flows. Okay, the last example was untrue, though the tenor of the piece was the now rote theme that everything is melting, melting, melting (what a world, what a world!).
Then the narrator intoned something that I’d not heard amid all of the claims that Global Warming is the result of Man’s Wanton Negligence, to wit, the big reason the Earth is warming is that the Sun is gradually getting hotter! Scientists (often invoked but almost never individually named) estimate that in 500,000,000 years mankind will become extinct or – at the very least – will need to find a new home.
Hmmm… Perhaps Global Warming not our fault after all. That’s not to say that we all can’t and shouldn’t live more responsibility, but if the Sun is indeed turning up the heat there’s precious little that we do to stop it. At the end of the day, all Global Warming really means is that things are changing.
Well, things are always changing, and whether the consequences are perceived as good or bad has a lot to do with one’s attitude towards change. You can certainly argue that abrupt environmental changes such as forest fires and earthquakes can be disastrous – especially to folks living in the immediate locale. Yet, it’s also true that wild fires are part of a forest’s regenerative lifecycle, and many of the geographic features prized by outdoor lovers, like alpine lakes and rugged coastlines, are the result of seismic upheaval.
I say, “Why let doomsday prophets highjack the Global Warming brand?” Suppose the Arctic Sea unfreezes to the point where it becomes passable in the summer, couldn’t one consequence be a land rush for vacation property in the vast currently inhospitable tracts of Northern Canada? What if Greenland were to become green as it was when it was originally named? Say that the Equatorial band extends up to
After all, scientists (those anonymous sages) give us half-a-billion years to prepare for the direst consequences of Global Warming. It only took mankind 10,000 years to advance from hunting and gathering to space travel. I’m sure we can come up with something.






